Justin Dean Schultz v. Analisa French Perkins
Syllabus
In this appeal from the district court's order denying mother's motions to modify custody, parenting time, and child support, mother argues that the district court erred by (1) denying her motion to modify custody, (2) denying her alternative request for two additional weeks of parenting time in the summer, and (3) denying her motion to modify child support. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying mother's motion to modify custody, we affirm in part. But because the district court implicitly denied, without findings or discussion, mother's alternative request for additional summer parenting time and mother's motion to modify child support, we reverse in part and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion and as discussed below.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.