Justin D. Maurer v. Crystal Cobb-Maurer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate that the petitioner for an order of protection felt terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened
• holding that the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate that the petitioner for an order of protection felt terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened
• holding ex-husband’s e-mails and texts to ex-wife would not cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened
• there is no requirement in the anti-stalking statute that the contact at issue be threatening on its face, and stalking may be found where other evidence is sufficient to prove that the contact amounted to harassment
• evidence was insufficient to establish stalking where only one email was admitted into evidence, there was no evidence that petitioner asked respondent to cease contacting her, and petitioner did not testify regarding the effect respondent’s contacts had on her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).