Justice v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Claims Court does not' have jurisdiction over claims brought under the First Amendment or the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause because they are not money-mandating
• upholding a Navy corrections board decision relying on an advisory opinion
• “[0]ur court has repeatedly held that we lack jurisdiction over such claims because the statute is not money-mandating.”
• “The arbitrary and capricious standard ... is highly deferential and requires a reviewing court to sustain an agency action evincing rational reasoning and consideration of relevant factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).