Justice v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• client of a vocational rehabilitation agency does not have the final or exclusive decision-making authority to determine his own vocational goal
• state agency did not violate Title I when it refused to send a client to out-of-state center for the blind where local institutions could provide sufficient training at lower cost
• agency may give due regard to financial costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).