Justice Administrative Com'n v. Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting it is a departure from essential requirements of law to ignore the plain, unambiguous language in a statute
• quashing the order requiring the Commission to pay attorney’s fees because the applicable statute did not create a right to publicly-funded counsel
• “When the circuit court does not apply the plain and unam biguous language of the relevant statute, it departs from the essential requirements of law.”
• “When the circuit court does not apply the plain and unambiguous language of the relevant statute, it departs from the essential requirements of law.”
• “When the circuit court does not apply the plain and unambiguous language of the relevant statute, it departs from the essential requirements of law.”
• “When the circuit court does not apply the plain and unambiguous language of the relevant statute, it departs from the essential requirements of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).