Skip to main content
· 5/7/1883

Justh v. Holliday

Citations

  • 13 D.C. 346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • implicitly recognizing that a contract made in violation of Chapter 467 would be unenforceable, but finding plaintiff's activity an isolated transaction not constituting the practice of architecture so as to bring into play the rule
  • construing the prior version of § 481.223

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Hagner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.