Just Rests. v. Thames Rest. Grp., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding trial court erred in denying mistrial because prosecutor in closing argument \told jurors that [defendant's] DNA was present\ when expert actually testified \she could not exclude [defendant] as being the source of DNA\
• finding trial court erred in denying mistrial because prosecutor in closing argument \told jurors that [defendant's] DNA was present\ when expert actually testified \she could not exclude [defendant] as being the source of DNA\
• analyst’s testimony that defendant’s DNA might have been present at the scene did not support prosecutor’s argument, “stating emphatically that [the defendant’s] DNA was present”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).