Jurski v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[a]n allegation of noncompliance with Federal Trade Commission regulations, including 16 C.F.R. § 436, can state a claim under G.L. c. 93A”
• noting that the plaintiff was entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to a provision in his franchise agreement if he was successful in the lawsuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).