Jurin v. Google Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of several claims; rejecting argument that CDA did not apply because Google “suggest[ed] keywords to competing advertisers”
• “The CDA provides complete immunity to any provider or user of an interactive computer service from liability premised on information provided by another content provider.”
• “The CDA provides complete immunity to any provider or user of an interactive computer 21 service from liability premised on information provided by another content provider.”
• negligent and intentional interference with contractual relations, fraud, unjust enrichment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).