Skip to main content
· 11/19/2014

Jurden v. HSBC Mortgage Corp.

Citations

  • 330 Ga. App. 179
  • 765 S.E.2d 440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a homeowner had no standing to challenge “.the assignment of the security interest ... [because] he was not a party to [the] contract”
  • where plaintiff was not a party to loan agreement or assignment of security interest nor a third-party beneficiary under either agreement, he lacked standing to challenge either agreement
  • where plaintiff was not a party to loan agreement or assignment of security interest nor a third party beneficiary under either agreement, he lacked standing to challenge either agreement
  • dismissal proper where allegations of complaint show plaintiff lacked standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFadden, Andrews, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.