· 2/3/1988
Jurado v. Simos
Citations
- 519 N.E.2d 1018
- 166 Ill. App. 3d 380
- 116 Ill. Dec. 803
- 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 94
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the equitable doctrine of merger can operate to cancel a debt if one individual is both the obligor and the obligee on the note
- the merger doctrine was applied to cancel a mortgage note, with no mention of intent or intention
- the merger doctrine was applied to cancel a mortgage note, with no mention of intent or intention
- Illinois courts will “sometimes” prevent a merger, even when one party is both obligor and obligee of a note, but only for the purpose of promoting substantial justice
- Illinois courts will “sometimes” prevent a merger, even when one party is both obligor and obligee of a note, but only for the purpose of promoting substantial justice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.