Skip to main content
· 2/3/1988

Jurado v. Simos

Citations

  • 519 N.E.2d 1018
  • 166 Ill. App. 3d 380
  • 116 Ill. Dec. 803
  • 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the equitable doctrine of merger can operate to cancel a debt if one individual is both the obligor and the obligee on the note
  • the merger doctrine was applied to cancel a mortgage note, with no mention of intent or intention
  • the merger doctrine was applied to cancel a mortgage note, with no mention of intent or intention
  • Illinois courts will “sometimes” prevent a merger, even when one party is both obligor and obligee of a note, but only for the purpose of promoting substantial justice
  • Illinois courts will “sometimes” prevent a merger, even when one party is both obligor and obligee of a note, but only for the purpose of promoting substantial justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.