Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Shipley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court need not “indulge in unwarranted inferences in order to save a complaint from dismissal”
• “To survive a motion to dismiss, a com- plaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”
• “[E]ven if the United States suffers no proprietary injury involving diminishment of the federal treasury, [it] suffers an injury when the false marking statute is violated, [so] Juniper had standing to assert a qui tam claim.”
• “[E]ven if the United States suffers no proprietary injury involving diminishment of the federal treasury, [it] suffers an injury when the false marking statute is violated, [so] Juniper had standing to assert a qui tam claim.”
• “[E]ven if the United States suffers no proprietary injury involving diminishment of the federal treasury, [it] suffers an injury when the false marking statute is violated, [so] Juniper had standing to assert a qui tam claim.”
• “[E]ven if the United States suffers no proprietary injury involving diminishment of the federal treasury, [it] suffers an injury when the false marking statute is violated, [so] Juniper had standing to assert a qui tam claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).