Skip to main content
N.D. Ohio· 7/2/1998

Junger v. Daley

Citations

  • 8 F. Supp. 2d 708
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10225
  • 1998 WL 388972

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that encryption software in source code form is functional rather than expressive and therefore not protected speech
  • \[T]he prior restraint doctrine is not implicated simply because an activity may on occasion be expressive.\
  • “[T]he prior restraint doctrine is not implicated simply because an activity may on occasion be expressive.”
  • \The Export Regulations do not single out encryption software.\
  • “The Export Regulations do not single out encryption software.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.