N.D. Ohio· 7/2/1998
Junger v. Daley
Citations
- 8 F. Supp. 2d 708
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10225
- 1998 WL 388972
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that encryption software in source code form is functional rather than expressive and therefore not protected speech
- \[T]he prior restraint doctrine is not implicated simply because an activity may on occasion be expressive.\
- “[T]he prior restraint doctrine is not implicated simply because an activity may on occasion be expressive.”
- \The Export Regulations do not single out encryption software.\
- “The Export Regulations do not single out encryption software.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.