Jung v. Myer
Citations
- 11 N.M. 378
- 68 P. 933
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS.</p> <p>1. Laws 1901, c. 82, authorizing appeals to the Supreme Court from interlocutory orders affecting substantial rights, is invalid, as being in conflict with the organic act, providing that appeals shall be allowed in all eases “from final decisions of district courts to the Supreme Court, under such regulations as may be prescribed by law.”</p> <p>2. An order vacating an attachment is not a final decision, within the provision of the organic act authorizing an appeal to the Supreme Court from final decisions of the district court.</p>
Judges: Baker, McFie, McMillan, Mills, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.