Juneau v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing public policy advanced by guidelines to ‘‘[account] for all income that would have been available to support the children had the family remained intact’’
• affirming award of attorney’s fees by trial court where trial court found it ‘‘ ‘fair and appropriate’ ’’ to award counsel fees to wife
• affirming award of attorney's fees by trial court where trial court found it \ 'fair and appropriate' \ to award counsel fees to wife
• one-half of household expenses attributed to parent’s income as gifts where cohabitant paid all household expenses without reimbursement
• interpretation of statutory scheme that governs child support determinations in Connecticut constitutes question of law
• trial court’s failure to apply statutory guidelines constitutes incorrect application of law, and, therefore, abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).