Juneac v. ITT Hancock Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The applicability of § 361 . . . includes not only wages actually earned after the injury, but also any the employee has the capacity to earn”
• wcab erred in awarding supplemental ben efits to the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1994-08-30· cited 40×
• Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-03-01· cited 11×
• Corbett v. Montgomery Ward & Co, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-07-06· cited 9×
• Flint v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-06-19· cited 5×
• Petrie v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-01-22· cited 4×
• McDougall v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-09-17· cited 2×
• Eaton v. Chrysler Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1994-02-07· cited 2×
• Sharpe v. Angora Enterprises
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-08-07· cited 1×
• Zoccola v. Chrysler Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-10-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nunn v. GA CANTRICK CO., INC.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-18· cited 16×
• Frammolino v. Richmond Products Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-10-10· cited 16×
• Flynn v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-05-20· cited 12×