June Roberts Agency, Inc. v. Venture Properties, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the existence of a contractual agreement \precludes recovery on a theory of unjust enrichment\
• “[Plaintiff], however, is not precluded from pleading both theories because a factfinder may find that no contract exists and may still award damages on the theory of unjust enrichment.”
• existence of contract is question of fact to be determined by jury
• plaintiff \is not precluded from pleading\ legally inconsistent theories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).