June Cruz v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the FMLA protects leave requests only if “the employer already knows that the employee has an FMLA-approved reason for leave” or if “the employee make[s] the employer aware that [his] absence is due to a potentially FMLA-qualifying reason.”
• “An employee is not required to assert expressly her right to take leave under the FMLA.” (citing 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.302(c), 825.303(b))
• “An employee is not required to assert expressly her right to take leave under the FMLA.”
• “An employee is not required to assert expressly her right to take leave under the FMLA.”
• “The FMLA requires employees to provide 30 days advance notice of the leave, when the need to take leave is foreseeable. ... [I]f the need for leave is not foreseeable-....” (emphasis added)
• “Once an employee gives sufficient notice to her employer that potentially FMLA-qualifying leave is needed, 6 The quotation appears to instead come from 29 C.F.R. § 825.301(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).