Jumeau v. Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in Swartz, “stacking was permitted when what appeared to be ‘policy-based’ UIM coverage was in fact per-car coverage”
• explaining that in Swartz, “stacking was permitted when what appeared to be ‘policy-based’ UIM coverage was in fact per-car coverage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).