Julio & Sons Co. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that duty for negligent misrepresentation arose from the contractual relationship between the parties
• applying the eight-corners rule to a duty to pay defense cost reasoning that there was no material difference between an unconditional duty to advance payment cost and a duty to defend
• “[T]o the extent the Underlying Complaint states valid fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims against Julio & Sons, the claims would not exist but for the express agreement . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).