JULIO MELENDEZ v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that revocation of probation based on an uncharged violation deprives the defendant of due process and constitutes fundamental error
• holding that where the trial court revoked probation based on conduct not alleged in the affidavit, the reversal would be \without prejudice to the State - 11 - proceeding on the original affidavit or filing an appropriate affidavit\
• holding it was fundamental error to revoke probation on uncharged allegations
• observing, in another case in which the State conceded error, that “the trial court committed reversible error by failing to specify what condition [the defendant] violated in its order revoking probation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).