Julio Estrada-Hernandez v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding we can reverse the BIA’s findings of fact under the asylum substantial- evidence test only if “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary” (quotation omitted)
• considering the adverse factors of a fraudulent marriage, criminal history, and lack of credibility
• noting substantial-evidence standard applies to factual determinations made in the CAT context as well
• “On appeal of a BIA order, ‘[t]he scope of our review is governed by the form of the BIA decision.’” (alteration in original
• “[OJther circuits to address this issue have considered marriage fraud a significant negative factor that supported discretionary denial of asylum.”
• “[A] request for protection under the CAT involves factual determinations reviewed for substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).