Julin v. Julin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Wife’s acceptance of the revised payment arrangement for more than five years constituted acquiescence and she was thereby estopped from asserting a right to additional payments.”
• “This Court has ruled that an ‘award of fees may not be made arbitrarily and a statement as to the reasons for an award of costs and fees should appear in the record.’ Lee v. Green, Del.Supr., 574 A.2d 857 (1990) (emphasis supplied
• “Acquiescence is an equitable defense . . . .”
• “Acquiescence is an equitable defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).