Julie K. Hertzberg v. Sram Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff seeking back pay must show either actual or constructive discharge
• holding that, in the Title VII context, an employee who resigns and fails to demonstrate that she was constructively discharged is not entitled to reinstatement
• concluding that, even if the plaintiff “may well have convinced a jury that she had been constructively discharge,” failure to pursue a constructive discharge claim precluded lost wages award
• holding that a plaintiff seeking back pay must show either actual or constructive discharge
• stating that no entitlement to equitable relief, whether back pay, front pay or reinstatement, exists if the plaintiff departed from the position in question and is unable to establish either actual or constructive discharge
• stating that no entitlement to equitable relief, whether back pay, front pay or reinstatement, exists if the plaintiff departed from the position in question and is unable to establish either actual or constructive discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).