Julie Beberman v. Antony Blinken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that § 2254(e)(2) is “a non-jurisdictional provision”
• reiterating that appellees may forfeit issues by failing to brief them
• reiterating that appellees may forfeit issues by failing to brief them
• vacating and remanding with instructions that the district court issue the writ of habeas corpus unless the State of South Carolina grants Stokes a new sentencing hearing within a reasonable time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).