· 8/24/2000
Julie Beaty v. Bet Holdings, Inc.
Citations
- 222 F.3d 607
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7108
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21407
- 2000 WL 1199714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding to ensure that district court understood that it had discretion to reduce fees based upon results obtained
- “[A] trial court does not under California law abuse its discretion by simply awarding fees in an amount higher, even very much higher, than the damage awarded, where successful litigation causes conduct which FEHA was enacted to deter to be exposed- and corrected.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, Berzon, Breyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.