Julie A. Rager v. Dade Behring, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an employee’s termination was appropriate because any absence beyond the deadline for turning in medical certification was not an entitled absence under the FMLA
• concluding that an employee’s termination was appropriate because any absence beyond the deadline for turning in medical certification was not an entitled absence under the FMLA
• explaining that an employer may require certification, but if the health condition was “unforeseeable,” the employee must have “at least 15 calendar days in which to submit it”
• “[An] employer is required to notify the employee promptly and in writing of the 15-day deadline”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).