Juliano v. Federal Asset Disposition Ass'n (FADA)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a qui tam action against an entity owned and controlled by a federal government agency, commenting that “[t]he Court fails to see how such a redistribution of funds within the federal government creates the requisite case or controversy”
• “[T]his section, by its placement in the statute, appears to pertain to actions in which the government has already intervened . . . .”
• “Under our federal scheme, the Attorney General . . . decides whom to prosecute for violations of federal law. The Court will not assume that the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act were intended to curtail the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).