Juliana, Inc. v. Salzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Florida’s statute of frauds requires that an agreement by one party to pay the debt of another party be in writing
• holding that Florida’s statute of frauds requires that an agreement by one party to pay the debt of another party be in writing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• ADVANCED MARKET. SYS. CORP. v. ZK Yacht Sales
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-20· cited 21×
• Marriott International, Inc. v. American Bridge Bahamas, Ltd.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-16· cited 12×
• Ralston Purina Company v. Nabisco, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1976-08-25· cited 4×
• Tobias v. Englander
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-04-06· cited 1×
• Morange v. Morange
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-09· cited 1×
• Akers v. Salzman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-11-23
• Riba v. Pila
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-19