Julian v. City of Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while at- will employees are not barred from recovering front pay, at-will status is a “factor for the district court to consider”
• explaining that “the district court should have considered, as a threshold matter, whether [re]instatement was feasible,” regardless of the parties’ agreement that reinstatement was not feasible, and remanding for such consideration
• holding front pay is an equitable issue for the judge to determine
• using front pay in lieu of reinstatement in the ADEA context
• “Our Title VII cases hold that ‘receipt of a right-to-sue letter is not jurisdictional but a condition precedent subject to equitable modification.’ ”
• “[A] complainant who timely files the EEOC charge and then observes the sixty-day waiting period has satisfied the statutory preconditions to filing suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).