Skip to main content
· 9/29/1972

Julia Rogers v. Leroy Loether

Citations

  • 467 F.2d 1110
  • 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 956
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \It is not unreasonable to regard an award of back pay [under Title VII] as an appropriate exercise of a chancellor's power to require restitution. Restitution is clearly an equitable remedy.\ (footnote omitted)
  • “It is not unreasonable to regard an award of back pay [under Title VII] as an appropriate exercise of a chancellor’s power to require restitution. Restitution is clearly an equitable remedy.” (footnote omitted)
  • “The payment of compensatory damages in a housing discrimination case … is … a payment in money for those losses … which plaintiff has suffered by reason of a breach of duty by defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swygert, Stevens, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.