Julia M. Smith v. Nat. SEC. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a plaintiff could not invoke § 6-2-3 where the plaintiff failed to allege fraudulent concealment with particularity
• finding that a plaintiff could not invoke § 6-2-3 where the plaintiff failed to allege fraudulent concealment with particularity
• finding that a plaintiff could not invoke § 6-2-3 where the plaintiff failed to allege fraudulent concealment with particularity
• “Unlike Smith’s complaint— where there is no reference to concealment — the complaint under consideration in Miller at least contained reference to concealment. Nevertheless, this court found the complaint in Miller to be insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).