Julce v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a conviction under M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C constitutes an aggravated felony conviction for purposes of the INA
• holding that a petitioner bears the burden of proving that a state marijuana conviction did not involve remuneration to escape the conclusion that the conviction amounted to a federal felony
• noting that the question whether an alien can introduce evidence outside of the record of conviction to show that his conviction would fall within 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(4) “is an issue the BIA may wish to address”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).