Fifth Circuit· 12/22/1994
Jukic v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Citations
- 40 F.3d 747
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36070
- 1994 WL 682375
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he would be persecuted based on his political opinion rather than his prior refusal to fight with the Croatian army
- explaining that unsubstantiated allegations regarding fear are insufficient to establish persecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Barksdale, Benavides
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jose Orellana-Monson v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 2012-06-25· cited 581×
- Hekmat Wadih Mikhael v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceFifth Circuit· 1997-06-04· cited 479×
- Khagendra Sharma v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 2013-08-30· cited 125×
- Tesfamichael v. GonzalesFifth Circuit· 2006-10-24· cited 87×
- Argueta-Hernandez v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2023-12-05· cited 24×
- Boika v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2013-08-16· cited 22×
- Mohammad v. AshcroftFifth Circuit· 2004-02-18· cited 1×
- Fangwen Yang v. HolderFifth Circuit· 2010-12-20· cited 1×
- Mikhael v. INSFifth Circuit· 1997-07-15
- Jose Orellana-Monson v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 2012-06-28
- Khagendra Sharma v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 2013-09-09
- Tatsiana Boika v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2013-08-16
- Victor Revencu v. Jefferson Sessions, IIIFifth Circuit· 2018-08-02
- Jiang v. HolderFifth Circuit· 2011-08-05
- Chai Chen v. HolderFifth Circuit· 2012-01-10
- Guzman-Galeano v. HolderFifth Circuit· 2012-10-16
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.