Judy Weekes-Walker v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 2102(b)(2)(B) lists circumstances under which no WARN Act notice is required
• reading the natural-disaster exception to “entirely eliminate the requirement for notice,” unlike “the unforeseeable business circumstances defense”
• “[I]t is manifest that a WARN Act. employer attempting to circumvent the 60-day notice requirement must still give some notice in accord with [the ' other requirements of the Act].”
• “Where there is statutory ambiguity we defer to the interpretation of the WARN Act by the agency charged with its implementation, the Department of Labor (DOL).”
• “it is manifest that a WARN Act employer attempting to circumvent the 60–day notice requirement must still give some notice in accord with 29 U.S.C. § 2102(b)(3
• “it is manifest that a WARN Act employer attempting to circumvent the 60–day notice requirement must still give some notice in accord with 29 U.S.C. § 2102(b)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).