Skip to main content
· 2/23/2009

Judy v. Martin

Citations

  • 674 S.E.2d 151
  • 381 S.C. 455
  • 2009 S.C. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Appellant may not seek relief from a prior unappealed order of the circuit court because the ruling has become the law of the case
  • determining that a party may not seek relief from an order not appealed \because the order has become the law of the case\
  • holding an unappealed ruling is the law of the case and may not be reviewed on appeal
  • “Under the law-of-the-case doctrine, a party is precluded from relitigating ..., [inter alia,] matters that were [ ] not raised on appeal, but should have been.... ”
  • “Under the law-of-the-case doctrine, a party is precluded from relitigating, after an appeal, matters that were either not raised on appeal, but should have been, or raised on appeal, but expressly rejected by the appellate court.”
  • “Under the law-of-the-case doctrine, a party is precluded from relitigat-ing, after an appeal, matters that were either not raised on appeal, but should have been, or raised on appeal, but expressly rejected by the appellate court. C.J.S. Appeal & Error § 991 (2008)... .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Waller, Beatty, Kittredge, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.