Skip to main content
· 6/29/2012

Judy Larson v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Citations

  • 687 F.3d 109
  • 82 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1288
  • 2012 WL 2478376
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing conflict between class counsel and class members within context of appeal of class certification and settlement approval
  • “The adequacy inquiry under Rule 23(a)(4) serves to uncover conflicts of interest between named parties and the class they seek to represent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Jordan, McKEE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.