Judy CASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “all that is required is that the hypothetical question be supported by the medical evidence in the record.”
• stating that the questions posed to the vocational expert should incorporate all of the claimant’s limitations from the medical record
• stating that the questions posed to the vocational expert should incorporate all of the claimant’s limitations from the medical record
• stating that “when considering the appropriateness of an hypothetical question posed to a vocational expert, ‘[a]ll that is required is that the hypothetical question be supported by the medical evidence in the record’”
• \This court has twice before stated that when considering the appropriateness of an hypothetical question posed to a vocational expert '[a]ll that is required is that the hypothetical question be supported by the medical evidence in the record.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).