Skip to main content
· 3/21/1989

Judy Batchelor v. Oak Hill Medical Group

Citations

  • 870 F.2d 1446
  • 10 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2306
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3378
  • 1989 WL 23800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court 26 did not err in denying leave to amend where the plaintiff’s proposed amendments would still be 27 preempted under federal law
  • \ERISA is remedial legislation which should be liberally construed in favor of protecting participants in employee benefit plans.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Tang, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.