Judson Atkinson Candies, Inco v. Kenray Associates, Incorporate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, insofar as Circle Center might be read to \announce a new categorical rule\ of Indiana law, such rule \is inconsistent with the Indiana Supreme Court's pronouncements\ and other decisions of our Court
• expressly rejecting argument that five-year statute of limitations applies to IRPA claims and citing cases
• “where the parties to an agreement have 18 See Truelove v. Berryhill, 753 Fed. Appx. 393, 397-98 (7th Cir. 2018) (argument “in a single-sentence footnote, without record support” deemed waived); United States v. Collins, 796 F.3d 829, 836 (7th Cir. 2015

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).