Judkins v. Davenport

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under the DMM, “a zip code may be omitted from certain items of mail, it is not a prerequisite to assuring that mail is properly routed to a particular addressee”
• under the DMM, “a zip code may be omitted from certain items of mail, it is not a prerequisite to assuring that mail is properly routed to a particular addressee”
• “[S]end us a proof of loss, which is your statement of the amount you are claiming under the policy signed and sworn to by you and which furnishes us with the following information: . . . .” (emphasis added)
• “[S]end us a proof of loss, which is your statement of the amount you are claiming under the policy signed and sworn to by you and which furnishes us with the following information: . . . .” (emphasis added)
• “[S]end us a proof of loss, . . . which furnishes us with the following 13 These include: “(a) The date and time of loss; (b) A brief explanation of how the loss happened; (c) Your interest (for example, “owner”) and the interest, if any, of others in the damaged property; (d
• “[S]end us a proof of loss, . . . which furnishes us with the following 12 These include: “(a) The date and time of loss; (b) A brief explanation of how the loss happened; (c) Your interest (for example, “owner”) and the interest, if any, of others in the damaged property; (d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).