Judith S. Feder v. Martin Marietta Corporation and Sperry Rand Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases regarding deputization and stating “[i]n light of the above authorities, the validity of the deputization theory, presumed to be valid here by the parties and by the district court, is unquestionable”
• \[A] person . . . could act as a deputy ... even in the absence of factors indicating an intention or belief on the part of both companies that he was so acting.\
• “[A] person ... could act as a deputy ... even in the absence of factors indicating an intention or belief on the part of both companies that he was so acting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).