Judith Odin v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exhaustion under the FTCA is a “‘jurisdictional prerequisite[ ]’ to suit”
• holding that exhaustion under the FTCA is a “‘jurisdictional prerequisite[ ]’ to suit”
• stating that 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) is a “‘jurisdictional prerequisite[ ]’ to suit”
• stating that section 2675(a) is a “‘jurisdictional prerequisite[]’ to suit”
• stating that section 2675(a) is a “‘jurisdictional prerequisite[]’ to suit”
• agency interpretation of regulation in a manner inconsistent with terms of parent legislation struck down

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).