Judith CARTER, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Et Al., Defendants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that fraud claim fails where plaintiff did not specify approximate dates on which fraudulent statements were made to her or specific nature of assurances
• noting that District of Columbia is a non- judicial foreclosure jurisdiction, which \allows foreclosure pursuant to a 'power of sale provision contained in any deed of trust\'
• finding that “predatory lending” allegations “revolv[ing] around the origination of the loan . . . cannot be sustained against Bank of America, which did not originate the loan”
• rejecting a gross negligence claim because the plaintiff failed to allege a non- contractual duty owed by the bank managing her mortgage
• noting plaintiff’s failure to plead elements of fraud claim, to “provide[] even approximate dates of when fraudulent statements were made to her [and] the specific nature of the assurances”
• noting plaintiff’s failure to plead elements of fraud claim, to “provide[] even approximate dates of when fraudulent statements were made to her [and] the specific nature of the assurances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).