Skip to main content
· 5/7/2013

Judith Barnett v. PA Consulting Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 404 U.S. App. D.C. 439
  • 715 F.3d 354
  • 2013 WL 1876247
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9229
  • 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,842
  • 118 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that weighing the evidence and making credibility determinations “are jury functions, not those of a judge at summary judgment”
  • noting that credibility determinations are beyond the scope of a court deciding a motion for summary judgment
  • noting that plaintiff’s “Title VII claims and DCHRA claims . . . rise and fall together”
  • noting court considers plaintiff’s DCHRA claims “in the same way we analyze Title VII claims.”
  • “Credibility determinations . . . are jury func- tions, not those of a judge at summary judgment.”
  • applying Brady framework to ADEA claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffith, Edwards, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.