· 5/7/2013
Judith Barnett v. PA Consulting Group, Inc.
Citations
- 404 U.S. App. D.C. 439
- 715 F.3d 354
- 2013 WL 1876247
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9229
- 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,842
- 118 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that weighing the evidence and making credibility determinations “are jury functions, not those of a judge at summary judgment”
- noting that credibility determinations are beyond the scope of a court deciding a motion for summary judgment
- noting that plaintiff’s “Title VII claims and DCHRA claims . . . rise and fall together”
- noting court considers plaintiff’s DCHRA claims “in the same way we analyze Title VII claims.”
- “Credibility determinations . . . are jury func- tions, not those of a judge at summary judgment.”
- applying Brady framework to ADEA claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Griffith, Edwards, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.