Judith Alter Kallman v. Radioshack Corporation, F/k/a Tandy Corporation, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that interpretation of the terms of an unambiguous contract is “traditionally a question of law”
• distinguishing the case where “the parties have specifically included language in the contract to preserve” the rights of sub-tenants
• “extensive damage . . . did not constitute ‘reasonable wear and tear’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).