Skip to main content
· 6/11/2024

Judith A. Shears and Gary F. Shears, Jr. v. Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that words and phrases of a statute should not be construed in isolation
  • explaining that “and” and “or” are used interchangeably depending on the context
  • explaining that “and” and “or” are used interchangeably depending on the context
  • explaining that “and” and “or” are used interchangeably depending on the context
  • in construing statutory language, we may consider the consequences that would result in interpreting the statute one way or another
  • deference is owed to the construction of a statute by the agency charged with its interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.