['Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of the Navy']

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to decide whether a memorandum was a predecisional document because the parties only challenged the redacted signature pages in the memorandum
• declining to decide whether a document was pre-decisional because the parties only challenged the redacted signature pages in the document
• permitting agency to submit additional information after denial of motion for summary judgment
• “[T]he potential adverse consequences [of disclosure] must be real rather than speculative,” and the risk “must be ‘more palpable than mere possibilities.’” (quoting Dep’t of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 380 n.19 (1976))
• “[A] bare assertion that a document’s disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of ... personal privacy is not sufficient to establish that a substantial privacy interest in preventing disclosure exists.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).