Skip to main content
· 5/25/1990

Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission v. Digby

Citations

  • 302 Ark. 333
  • 789 S.W.2d 731
  • 1990 Ark. LEXIS 349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing denial of summary judgment to property owner where “potholes were open and obvious” and “nothing obstructed [the plaintiff’s] ability to see” the hole she stepped in
  • plaintiff testified that she saw the potholes when she drove into the parking lot
  • despite plaintiff’s contention that she did not realize a pothole was behind her, her claim failed as a matter of law because the hazard was open and obvious and nothing obstructed her view of it
  • “Because [the plaintiff’s] knowledge of the hazard that caused her fall and resulting injuries was at least equal to that of the landowner, she may not recover. It follows that the defendants should have been granted summary judgment on this basis.”
  • corn hole game at car dealership a static condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deny, Glaze, Hays, Prohibition, Reasons, Writ

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.