Judi Patrizi v. Scott Huff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting Fourth Amendment right to be free from arrest without probable cause is clearly established
• identifying the same elements, but dividing them into three elements instead of five
• “[T]he U.S. Supreme Court has clearly established that nonaggressive questioning of police officers is constitutionally protected conduct.”
• “Ohio courts have affirmed obstruction convictions premised on true speech only when that speech involved yelling, cursing, aggressive conduct, and/or persistent disruptions after warnings from the police against interrupting the investigation.”
• “To date, Ohio courts have affirmed obstruction convictions premised on true speech only when that speech involved yelling, cursing, aggressive conduct, and/or persistent disruptions after warnings from the police against interrupting the investigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).